In the paper on behalf of the Long Range Planning Committee I hope to provide participants the opportunity to respond to many aspects of the entire DivCHED operation. The position will be that any organization must review its procedures, etc., periodically to maintain viable status. This gives the organization the opportunity to identify what is working well and meets objectives but also provides the opportunity to identify any changes or new procedures that may meet new objectives or directions.
In this light I hope to address some of the following issues. (As some of you know, I prefer concept maps to outlines so I will try to outline the major points I hope to cover in the paper.)
As this paper was generated, the following questions emerged and are listed in no particular order of priority. Background information and rationales follow the list of questions.
The DivCHED Long Range Planning Committee may have the lowest profile among the division committees but it is interested in what members perceive and anticipate regarding the future of the DivCHED. This document identifies most of the issues that the LRPC has discussed during the recent meetings. We seek input from the group at large regarding what is perceived to be going well and what might need to be changed to improve the activities for professional chemical educators.
The American Chemical Society Council (ACS) Committee on Divisional Activities has recommended in a recent white paper that each division review its practices, programs, policies, etc. and determine if everything is current and consistent with professional needs and operations at a time when the nature of chemistry as a discipline is being redefined (by practice, not formal decision-making) to be more interdisciplinary in nature than the current chemistry curriculum based on classical pedagogy (1).
Recent annual reviews of the DivCHED activities have been positive and suggest that the DivCHED is a healthy, active, and successful organization. If this is the situation, then it might be reasonable to ask why members of the group are being asked to take time from their busy schedules to review activities of the Division and think about the future. This review process is analogous to your regular physical check-ups. In order to maintain a viable and healthy body or organization it is good practice to review current processes and practices periodically and selectively adjust, if appropriate or as needed, to maintain or improve the current status.
As the DivCHED begins the challenging review and evaluation process, it is important to keep in mind that the:
MEMBERSHIP
The current membership of the Division is about 5000. Many issues related to various aspects of membership have been discussed and have centered on ideas such as:
Increasing and broadening the membership
Although a membership of 5000 might appear to be sufficient for an organization to sustain itself, there are many colleagues who are missing out on benefits, such as professional contacts and participation, that the DivCHED has to offer as well as the opportunity to contribute to their profession. Additional members may generate more programming and activities leading to a greater variety of opportunities to participate for all members.
Increasing member participation and recognizing members for their contributions
The DivCHED has many activities and membership participation is necessary to organize and make sure things go as planned. There is a perception that a few people "are doing all the work" or that the same people are always called upon to maintain the program. Willingness to participate may be related to many things including knowing what activities are of interest to members (see below). Inability to attend committee meetings as described by the DivCHED operations manual may be a limiting factor for increasing member participation.
Timely recognition of member contributions may be another motivating factor for participation. Rather than waiting to recognize individuals for their lifetime contributions, is there a relatively easy and not too costly method for the DivCHED to recognize contributions on a more timely basis.
The challenge of getting newer members into leadership positions within the DivCHED has been raised several times over the years. This seems to cycle back to participation, interest, and communicating these interests. One good way to exhibit this interest is to attend Executive Committee meetings and become familiar with the topics of discussion in that group.
Identifying members who want to be involved as well as how they want to be involved
People join groups and professional organizations for a variety of reasons. It is entirely possible that for many of the 5000 DivCHED members, the ability to list membership on yearly activity reports and getting publications from the organization is sufficient for their needs. At the same time, it is possible that some of these 5000 members would be more receptive to participate if they knew how to volunteer or if they had some contact person in the DivCHED. Relying on whom you know or waiting to be invited to participate may not be the best way to diversify membership or participation.
FINANCIAL ISSUES
Membership Dues
Although the DivCHED is fiscally sound at this time, some folks may believe that increasing the money could solve many problems.
National and Regional Meetings
Some DivCHED members have expressed concern that the cost of attending national meetings in high-cost cities combined with decreasing travel support from home institutions, negatively effects their ability to volunteer and participate in DivCHED activities. That, combined with the conflicts in teaching schedules, seems to suggest that regional meetings might play a significant role for increased participation and delivery of Division benefits for a significant number of members.
BEING THE "SET-ASIDE" ACS DIVISION
The remote locations of the DivCHED programs at national meetings is a continuing problem and seems to send a message that the DivCHED is less "worthy" than other divisions to be assigned space in central conference facilities. The high-school programming is usually in a location that is even remote from the location of the DivCHED symposia and activities. So even to a greater extent, high school teachers are way out of the communication loop. In some ways, this practice could be viewed as discriminatory. This practice also seems to support the stereotype of chemical educators as not being real chemists. Remote locations also increase the effort that DivCHED members must exert to attend programs or listen to selective chemical presentations, and interact with colleagues in the classic disciplines.
COMMITTEE STRUCTURE
A group the size of the DivCHED has several organizational options to conduct business. Currently, the majority of DivCHED committees address needs and opportunities for the diversity of subgroups within the DivCHED. Another organizational scheme would be to subdivide into different issue groups such as nature of institution (e.g., four-year non-PhD granting colleges, private colleges), job responsibilities (e.g., chemistry coordinators, chemical demonstrators) or some other subgroup categorization where programming would be directed and specific to the needs and interests of these focused groups.
Another strategy would be to examine the current committees and determine if any should be dissolved or incorporated into a different committee and/or new committees established or whether some committee responsibilities should be reassigned to different committees. For example:
PUBLICATIONS
The Journal of Chemical Education (JCE) is a monthly publication of the Division and unlike ACS Journals attempts to meet the needs of a more diverse readership than do other ACS division journals. JCE, including ancillary materials and services (e.g., JCE Software, JCE Online, JCE Online Store) is currently structured to be financially self-supporting and independent of the DivCHED treasury. Publishing a journal is expensive and decreasing subscriptions in recent years could put the publication of JCE in jeopardy. Is the problem of decreasing subscriptions a function of reduced financial support and the general economy or is it due, in large part, to not meeting the needs of the readers? Communications with ACS about publishing JCE have not been fruitful. With a new editor due to be in place in several years, it might be time to review the members or readers expectations for JCE and the necessity and/or appropriateness of ancillary services and materials.
The CHED Newsletter is published three times each year at considerable cost to the DivCHED. The Newsletter editor does a tremendous job of organizing information conveniently for DivCHED members. However, compared to other professional newsletters I receive, it seems to have expanded into something more than a newsletter. One could question the necessity of including summary descriptions of symposia presentations or a full meeting program. On the other hand, is this necessary because not all DivCHED members are also ACS members and, therefore, do not have access to information through ACS? Would it be viable to shift the delivery method to Web based delivery along with the budget set aside for editorship and publication? How much effort would be required do this and who would be responsible for doing this? Putting information "on the web" is too often voiced as a quick fix but maintaining an up-to-date website is time consuming. Would the work of volunteers be adequate and acceptable or would the cost of electronic publication on the web be about the same as publishing hard copy?
The Examinations Institute is also a financially self-supporting unit of the DivCHED. However, would input and involvement of a DivCHED Curriculum Committee play an important role in establishing topics, etc., included in the exams or provide insight into relevant curricular changes that could impact exams?
Many questions arise, some that I have not addressed, when examining the operation of any organization. Often there are more questions than viable answers or solutions. My goal in preparing this document was to raise questions and issues for further discussion and consideration...not to identify, prioritize, or solve any problems. I do not believe that all change is good in and of itself. As I get older I think along the line of "be careful what you wish for, you just might get it".
Bibliography